文章摘要
吴红宇,王克安,张兴录,金水高,冯子健.河南省两种麻疹免疫策略的成本-效果分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2000,21(2):121-123
河南省两种麻疹免疫策略的成本-效果分析
Cost -effectiveness analysis on two dif ferent measles immunization strategies
收稿日期:1999-03-28  出版日期:2014-09-16
DOI:
中文关键词: 麻疹免疫策略  成本-效果比
英文关键词: Measles immunization strategy  Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER)
基金项目:
作者单位
吴红宇 中国预防医学科学院计划免疫中心, 北京 100050 
王克安 中国预防医学科学院计划免疫中心, 北京 100050 
张兴录 中国预防医学科学院计划免疫中心, 北京 100050 
金水高 中国预防医学科学院统计室 
冯子健 河南省卫生防疫站 
摘要点击次数: 2790
全文下载次数: 968
中文摘要:
      目的 以河南省人口、经济和麻疹流行病学资料为基础, 从经济学角度对强化免疫策略与两剂免疫策略进行比较和评价. 方法 采用卫生经济学中成本 -效果分析方法, 时间区间为1997~ 2 0 2 0年, 效果指标为失能调整寿命损失年 (disabilityadjustedlifeyears, DALY), 成本 -效果比(cost-effectivenessratio, CER) =强化免疫策略与两剂免疫策略的费用差 /强化免疫策略与两剂免疫策略的效果差. 结果 随年份的增长, CER呈下降趋势, 从2013年起强化免疫策略有正效益. 结论 强化免疫策略不仅在降低麻疹发病、阻断麻疹传播方面有很好的效果, 在经济上也是合算的
英文摘要:
      Objective To seek the most economic and effective strategy in measles elimination in China, data of cost-effectiveness was analyzed to compare two different strategies of measles immunization (mass campaign and 2-dose schedule) based on the data of population, economy and epidemiological features of measles in Henan province. Methods DALY was used as the measurement of effectiveness. Taking period from 1997 to 2020, the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) was defined as the cost difference between mass campaign and 2-dose schedule divided by the decline of DALYs if 2-dose schedule had been substituted by mass campaign. Results Along with the increment of time, CER showed a descending trend then the mass campaign will have positive benefits after year 2013. Conclusion Mass campaign is more cost-effective than 2-dose schedule.
查看全文   Html全文     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭