文章摘要
洪志恒,王胜锋,刘淼,杨雅平,陈勇,刘庆敏,任艳军,吕筠,李立明.杭州市超市消费者预包装食品营养标签行为流行病学调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2011,32(7):657-660
杭州市超市消费者预包装食品营养标签行为流行病学调查
Study on knowledge.attitudes and use of the pre-packaged food nutrition labeling in Hangzhou supermarket consumers in 2010
收稿日期:2011-01-22  出版日期:2014-09-10
DOI:
中文关键词: 预包装食品  营养标签  知识  态度  行为  影响因素
英文关键词: Pre-packaged food  Nutrition labeling  Knowledge  attitudes  practice  Influeutial factors
基金项目:牛津健康联盟社区健康干预(CIH)项目
作者单位E-mail
洪志恒 10019 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系教育部流行病学重点实验室  
王胜锋 10019 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系教育部流行病学重点实验室  
刘淼 10019 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系教育部流行病学重点实验室  
杨雅平 10019 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系教育部流行病学重点实验室  
陈勇 10019 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系教育部流行病学重点实验室  
刘庆敏 杭州市疾病预防控制中心  
任艳军 杭州市疾病预防控制中心  
吕筠 10019 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系教育部流行病学重点实验室 lvjun@bjmu.edu.cn 
李立明 10019 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系教育部流行病学重点实验室 lmlee@pumc.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 2656
全文下载次数: 1197
中文摘要:
      目的了解杭州市超市消费者对预包装食品营养标签的认知、态度、行为的现状及其影响因素。方法采用自行拟定的调查量表,选取杭州市某大型超市,随机抽取顾客进行面对面访谈。结果在访谈的586(男202、女384)人中,平均年龄(41.6±17.23)岁。消费者对6种营养素的模拟购物题应答正确率依次为膳食纤维(71.84%)、脂肪(70.99%)、钙(60.75%)、盐(58.36%)、能量(50.85%)和糖(39.42%);对标识营养成分表、营养声称和希望了解相关知识的3个态度指标中,认同率分别为90.44%、87.03%和77.13%;对首次购买某食品阅读营养成分表和营养标签的2个行为指标中,阅读率分别为58.36%和80.03%。经logistic建模分析,男性、青少年、低教育人群是营养标签阅读行为的危险因素。结论消费者营养标签阅读、理解和正确应用营养标签的能力不高,亟待改进营养标签与声称的可读性和权威性,应制定全国营养知识健康教育规划。
英文摘要:
      Objective To study the prevalence rates of knowledge,attitudes and use of the nutrition labeling and related influential factors in Hangzhou supermarket consumers.Methods Using a self-developed survey questionnaire。randomly selected customers were conducted a face·tofaceinterview program in a large supermarket of Hangzhou city.Results 586 people were interviewed.including 202 males and 384 females.with the mean age as 4 1.6±l 7.23 years.The accuracy rates of 6 questions related to the‘ability of choosing healthier food by using the Nutrition Facts Labels’were as follows:dietary fiber(71.84%),fat(70.99%),calcium(60.75%),salt(58.36%).energy(50.85%)and sugar(39.42%).The support rates of the three attitudes indicators were“support marking the Nutrition Facts Label”(90.44%).“support marking the nutrition claims”(87.03%)and“want to know more relative knowledge”(77.1 3%).There were 58.36%and 80.03% first.time buyers who would read the Nutrition Facts Food Labels and the Nutfition C1aims.mugh logistic model analysis。male,youth,lOW.educated people were found to be the risk factors related to the nutrition labeI reading behavior.Conclusion The capacity of the reading,understanding and correct application of nutrition Iabeling among consumers was not satisfactory.Improvement on thereadability and the authority of nutrition labeling and me development of the national nutrition knowledge and health education programs were in urgent needs.
查看全文   Html全文     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭