| 任艳军,刘庆敏,曹承建,吕筠,李立明.杭州市城区初中教职工体力活动水平的影响因素分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2014,35(5):537-541 |
| 杭州市城区初中教职工体力活动水平的影响因素分析 |
| Impact factors on physical activity level among the urban junior high school personnel in Hangzhou |
| 收稿日期:2013-10-10 出版日期:2014-09-17 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2014.05.015 |
| 中文关键词: 体力活动 教职工 因素分析 |
| 英文关键词: Physical activity School personnel Factor analysis |
| 基金项目:社区健康干预（CIH）项目（牛津健康联盟·中国·杭州） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3076 |
| 全文下载次数: 1309 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 了解杭州市城区初中教职工体力活动水平及其影响因素。方法 2009年对杭州市3个城区的所有初中教职工进行横断面问卷调查。利用国际体力活动量表评价体力活动水平，采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验和多分类logistic回归法分析教职工体力活动水平的影响因素。结果 1 497名教职工达到低、中、高水平体力活动的比例分别为40.8%、40.6%和18.6%。与低水平体力活动的教职工相比较，年龄≥45岁（OR＝1.576，95%CI：1.128～2.201）和感到有一些压力（OR＝1.490，95%CI：1.141～1.946）的教职工达到中等水平体力活动的概率高。体力活动得分高（OR＝1.070，95%CI：1.002～1.143）、男性（OR＝3.088，95%CI：2.162～4.409）、同事经常/总是一起参加运动（OR＝2.903，95%CI：1.587～5.312）、同事有时一起参加运动（OR＝1.900，95%CI：1.160～3.110）和家附近有步行可达的地方（OR＝1.657，95%CI：1.022～2.688）达到高水平体力活动的概率高。婚姻状况、社会经济水平、工作年数、BMI、学历、同事鼓励参加运动与教职工增加体力活动水平的关联则无统计学意义。结论 杭州市城区初中教职工的体力活动水平有待加强，开展体力活动促进需要考虑年龄、性别、工作压力和支持性的工作及居住环境等因素影响。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the level of physical activities （PA） and related influencing factors among junior high school personnel in Hangzhou. Methods In a cross sectional study，a self administered questionnaire was used to assess the levels of PA. Kruskal-Wallis H test and ordinal regression were applied to analyze the related factors. Results Among the 1 497 school personnel included in this study，prevalence rates on the low，moderate and high levels of PA were40.8%，40.6% and 18.6%，respectively. Data from the multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that：when comparing with the low level，people aged ≥45（OR＝1.576，95% CI：1.128-2.201）orthose having minor perceived stress（OR＝1.490，95% CI：1.141-1.946）more likely to fall into themoderate level. However，factors as higher awareness scores on the benefit of PA（OR＝1.070， 95%CI：1.002-1.143），being male（OR＝3.088，95%CI：2.162-4.409），always or very often taking PAtogether with colleagues（OR＝2.903，95%CI：1.587-5.312），taking PA once in a while together withcolleagues（OR＝1.900，95%CI：1.160-3.110）or having space to walk around home（OR＝1.657，95% CI：1.022-2.688）would increase the like lihood of having high PA level. However，factors as marital status，socioeconomic status，years of working at school，BMI，level of having received education and positive impact from colleagues etc. did not seem to have significantly related to the PAlevel. Conclusion Gender，age，stress from work and supportive environment should be taken into account while on promoting the PA level among junior high school personnel in Hangzhou. |
|
查看全文
Html全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
