文章摘要
叶云凤,饶珈铭,王海清,张思恒,李洋,王声湧,董晓梅.广州市大学生暴力恐怖袭击应对行为及其影响因素分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(4):327-331
广州市大学生暴力恐怖袭击应对行为及其影响因素分析
Analysis on the individual-response behavior and the influence factors to violent terrorist attacks among undergraduates in Guangzhou
收稿日期:2014-09-15  出版日期:2015-04-04
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2015.04.007
中文关键词: 暴力恐怖袭击  个人应对行为  影响因素  大学生
英文关键词: Violent terrorist attacks  Individual response behaviors  Influence factors  Undergraduates
基金项目:卫生部公益性行业科研专项(201302003)
作者单位E-mail
叶云凤 510632 广州, 暨南大学医学院伤害预防与控制中心  
饶珈铭 510632 广州, 暨南大学医学院伤害预防与控制中心  
王海清 510632 广州, 暨南大学医学院伤害预防与控制中心  
张思恒 510632 广州, 暨南大学医学院伤害预防与控制中心  
李洋 510632 广州, 暨南大学医学院伤害预防与控制中心  
王声湧 510632 广州, 暨南大学医学院伤害预防与控制中心  
董晓梅 510632 广州, 暨南大学医学院伤害预防与控制中心 ntydxm@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 6392
全文下载次数: 3009
中文摘要:
      目的 分析广州市大学生暴力恐怖袭击个人应对行为及其影响因素。方法 采用分层整群抽样方法抽取广州市5所高校在读本科生共1 800名, 利用暴力恐怖袭击行为应对量表测量大学生相关应对行为, 用自编问卷收集人口学特征、认知情况和情感反应状态。结果 大学生应对暴力恐怖袭击的个人准备行为得分为13.49±5.02, 信息寻求行为得分为4.27±1.64, 规避行为得分为5.97±2.16。应对行为平均得分为23.73±7.21, 应对行为得分低和高的大学生占30.0%。不同性别、专业、有无宗教信仰的大学生应对行为得分的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。logistic回归分析发现, 女生(OR=1.46, 95%CI:1.06~2.01)、认为出现可能性越大(OR=1.60, 95%CI:1.12~2.30)、警觉性越高(OR=3.77, 95%CI:2.15~6.61)、应对信心越强(OR=0.34, 95%CI:0.24~0.48)和情感反应越大(情感反应较小OR=3.42, 95%CI:2.40~4.86;情感反应较大OR=0.23, 95%CI:0.13~0.41)对暴力恐怖袭击个人应对行为越突出。结论 广州市大学生对暴力恐怖袭击的个人应对行为较理想。出现可能性、警觉性、应对信心和情感反应是大学生暴力恐怖袭击应对行为的独立影响因素。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze related behaviors of individual preparedness and influencing factors on violent terrorist attacks among undergraduates. Methods A total of 1 800 undergraduates from 5 colleges or universities in Guangzhou were selected, using the stratified cluster method. A questionnaire involving the response to violent terrorist attack behavior was used to assess the individual preparedness behaviors among undergraduates. A self-made questionnaire was applied to collect information on demographic factors, cognitive and preparedness behaviors. Methods The mean score of individual preparedness behavior among undergraduates was 13.49±5.02 while information on seeking behavior was 4.27±1.64, avoidance behavior was 5.97±2.16 and violent terrorist attack response behaviors was 23.73±7.21, with 30.0 percent of undergraduates behaved properly. Significant differences were found in the scores of behaviors on the response to violent terrorist attack with different gender, major they pursue or religious belief (P<0.05), among undergraduates involved in this study. Results from the logistic regression analysis revealed that persons being girls (OR=1.46, 95%CI:1.06-2.01), with bigger perceived probability (OR=1.60, 95%CI:1.12-2.30), with higher alertness (OR=3.77, 95%CI:2.15-6.61), with stronger coping confidence (OR=0.34, 95%CI:0.24-0.48) and bigger affective response (OR1=3.42, 95%CI:2.40-4.86;OR2=0.23, 95%CI:0.13-0.41), would present more prominent behavior responses when facing the violent terrorist attack. Conclusion Individual response behaviors to violent terrorist attacks among undergraduates were relatively ideal. Perceived probability, alertness, coping confidence and affective response appeared to be independent influencing factors related to response behaviors against violent terrorist attack. In colleges and universities, awareness on violent terrorist attacks should be strengthened among undergraduates. Focus should target on psychological education dealing with disaster, knowledge and skills needed for emergency response, so as to respond to the emergency on campus.
查看全文   Html全文     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭