严重急性呼吸综合征康复病例血清中和抗体三年追踪观察

谢淑云; 曾光; 夏时畅; 张泮河; 尹卫东; 刘碧瑶; 杨仕贵; 曹务春

文章摘要

谢淑云,曾光,夏时畅,张泮河,尹卫东,刘碧瑶,杨仕贵,曹务春.严重急性呼吸综合征康复病例血清中和抗体三年追踪观察[J].中华流行病学杂志,2007,28(4):343-345

严重急性呼吸综合征康复病例血清中和抗体三年追踪观察

A three-year follow-up study on sera specific antibody in severe acute respiratory syndrome cases after the onset of illness

收稿日期:2006-12-15 出版日期:2014-09-12

DOI：

中文关键词: 严重急性呼吸综合征抗体中和试验随访调查

英文关键词: Severe acute respiratory syndrome Antibody Neutralized test Follow—up

基金项目:

作者	单位
谢淑云	310009, 杭州, 浙江省疾病预防控制中心
曾光	中国现场流行病学培训项目
夏时畅	310009, 杭州, 浙江省疾病预防控制中心
张泮河	军事医学科学院微生物流行病研究所
尹卫东	北京科兴生物制品有限公司
刘碧瑶	310009, 杭州, 浙江省疾病预防控制中心
杨仕贵	310009, 杭州, 浙江省疾病预防控制中心
曹务春	军事医学科学院微生物流行病研究所

摘要点击次数: 2719

全文下载次数: 937

中文摘要:

目的<\b> 了解严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)康复病例病后3年血清中和抗体水平及其变化规律,为SARS疫苗的研制和使用决策提供理论依据.方法<\b> 对SARS康复病例进行随访,分别采集病后第5个月、第20个月和第35个月的血清,每份血清标本均采用间接酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和微量中和试验二种方法<\b>进行血清SARS-CoV特异性抗体的检测.中和抗体效价采用Reed-Muench方法<\b>计算.3个时间点中和抗体效价的趋势分析采用对数转换后的数据进行重复测量方差分析.结果<\b> 分别采集到病后第5个月、第20个月和第35个月的血清标本13份、17份和13份,采用ELISA法检测的抗体阳性率分别为100%、82.4%和84.6%,而采用中和试验法检测的中和抗体阳性率均为100%,中和抗体效价依次为1∶43(1∶16～1∶203)、1∶36(1∶17～1∶59)和1∶21(1∶10～1∶39),其差异具有统计学意义(F=60.419,P＜0.001).病后第35个月时有30.8%(4/13)的病例血清中和抗体效价高于1∶36,但另有30.8%(4/13)的病例血清中和抗体效价等于或略高于1∶10(临界水平1∶8).结论<\b> SARS病例血清中和抗体至少可持续3年,但中和抗体效价随康复时间延长呈逐渐下降趋势;血清中和抗体效价个体差异较大,病后第35个月时部分病例的血清中和抗体效价已降至较低水平,何时完全消失尚需进一步追踪观察.

英文摘要:

Objective<\b> To study the va“ation of specific antibody among convalescent of severe acute respiratory syndrome(SARS)patients through a three-year program.1Ⅵethods Sera samples were collected from SARS cases in the 5m，20m and 35^{th<\sup> month after onset of the illness.The SARS-CoV sDecific antibodv was detected for all of them by ELISA and neutralized test simultaneOuslv.The titer of neutralizing antibodies was calculated using Reed-Muench method，and the comparison between different time groups was analyzed regarding the variance of data。n repeated measures after 1pgarithm converSion.Results<\b> 1 3， 17 and 13 sera samples were collected in the 5^{th<\sup>，20^{th<\sup> and 35^{th<\sup> month after onset.Results<\b> showed that deSpite the fact that the positive rates of ELISA antibody were 100％，82.4％and 84.6％respectively，the neutralizing antibody was still positive for all the sarnpleS.The average neutralizing andtibody titers were 1：43(1：16-1：203)，1：36(1：17.1：59)and 1：21(1：10.1：39)on the 5^{th<\sup>，20^{th<\sup> and 35^{th<\sup> month after onset， and the differences were statistically significant(F=60.419，P<0.001).On the 35^{th<\sup> month after the onset，30.8％(4／1 3)of the patients were still having the neutralizing antibody level of above 1：36，but the neutralizing antibody level in another 30.8％(4／13)of the patients had decreased to as low as 1：10，when the cut-off level was set as 1：8.Conclusion<\b> Results<\b> of the study indicated that the neutralizing antibody of SARS cases could last for at least three years， but the sera speci“c antibodv in SARS cases decreased gradually when time went by.However，neutralizing antibody in Some of the cases decreased to a10wer 1evel on the 35^{th<\sup> month.Further follow-up study was worthwhile to observe the long-lasting profile of antibody existence on SARS cases.}}}}}}}}}

查看全文 Html全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭