中国五城市餐饮业顾客对被动吸烟的认知和态度

刘瑞玲; 杨焱; 刘秀荣; 常爱玲; 龚洁; 赵白帆; 刘涛; 姜垣; Andrew Hyland; 李强

文章摘要

刘瑞玲,杨焱,刘秀荣,常爱玲,龚洁,赵白帆,刘涛,姜垣,Andrew Hyland,李强.中国五城市餐饮业顾客对被动吸烟的认知和态度[J].中华流行病学杂志,2008,29(5):421-424

中国五城市餐饮业顾客对被动吸烟的认知和态度

KnOwIedge and attitudes tOwards second hand smoking among hospitality patronage in fiVe cities in China

收稿日期:2008-01-31 出版日期:2014-09-15

DOI：

中文关键词: 烟草烟雾餐饮业顾客认知和态度

英文关键词: Second hand smoke Hospitality patronage Knowledge and attitudes

基金项目:美国Roswell Park TTuRC基金资助项目（P50CA111236）

作者	单位
刘瑞玲	中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心, 北京 100050
杨焱	中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心, 北京 100050
刘秀荣	中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心, 北京 100050
常爱玲	北京市疾病预防控制中心
龚洁	陕西省健康教育所
赵白帆	武汉市疾病预防控制中心
刘涛	云南省健康教育所
姜垣	贵州省疾病预防控制中心
Andrew Hyland	Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, USA
李强	Psychology Department, University of Waterloo ,Ontario, Canada

摘要点击次数: 3081

全文下载次数: 1060

中文摘要:

目的了解中国城市餐饮业顾客对被动吸烟的认知、态度。方法 2007年7-10月采用方便抽样的方法，对北京、西安、武汉、昆明、贵阳5个城市405家不同类型餐馆/酒吧的2109名顾客进行问卷调查。结果 43.1%的顾客对烟草危害有较全面的认识；近60%的顾客表示不曾主动反对他人在面前吸烟，近三分之一的顾客曾因接触“二手烟”感到不适而选择中途离开；支持餐馆/酒吧全部禁烟的比例分别为30.0%和19.8%；二项logistic回归模型分析表明，北京市顾客、≥25岁年龄组、大专及以上学历和非吸烟者更倾向于支持餐馆/酒吧禁烟；而北京市顾客、女性、大专及以上学历和非吸烟者更愿意去有禁烟规定的餐馆/酒吧消费。结论尽管5个城市餐饮业顾客对烟草烟雾的认知还有待提高，但餐馆/酒吧禁烟符合广大顾客的意愿，是公共场所控烟的趋势之一。

英文摘要:

Objective To understand the knowledge and attitudes towards second hand smoking(SHS) among restaurant or bar patronage in five cities in China. Methods 405 restaurants and bars were conveniently selected in 5 cities as Beijing, Wuhan, Xi'an, Kunming and Guiyang. From each of these hospitality venues, at least 3 patrons, including one smoker, one female non-smoker and one male nonsmoker were asked to answer a questionnaire on their knowledge and attitudes towards SHS and smoking policies in public places. Results 43.1% of the respondents had good knowledge on SHS hazards. 65%reported that those who smoked around them had never asked for their permission, and about 60%admitted that they had never asked others to stop smoking in front of them. There were almost two thirds of patrons reporting that they once felt discomfort of SHS in restaurants or bars, nearly half of whom chose free restaurants and bars' initiations were only 30.0% and 19.8%, respectively. In Beijing, logistic regression model analyses showed that those who supporting 100 % smoke-free restaurants and bars tended to be non-smokers, aged 25 years or older and to have had at least college education. Also in Beijing, those being female, having at least college education or non-smokers were more likely to choose restaurants and bars with smoking restrictions. Conclusion Though knowledge on SHS hospitality patronage was still not high or popular for the public to refuse SHS exposure, banning smoking in hospitality venues was public's inclination and would become a trend in public health endeavor.

查看全文 Html全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭