文章摘要
杨维中,李中杰,赖圣杰,金连梅,张洪龙,叶楚楚,赵丹,孙乔,吕炜,马家奇,王劲峰,兰亚佳.国家传染病自动预警系统运行状况分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2011,32(5):431-435
国家传染病自动预警系统运行状况分析
Preliminary application on China Infectious Diseases Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS), between 2008 and 2010
收稿日期:2011-01-29  出版日期:2014-09-10
DOI:
中文关键词: 传染病  预警系统
英文关键词: Infectious disease  Early-warning system
基金项目:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划(2006BAK01A13,2008BAI56B02);中国-世界卫生组织合作项目(WPCHN0801617,WPCHN1002405);国家科技重大专项(2009ZX10004-201)
作者单位E-mail
杨维中 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206 yangwz@chinacdc.cn 
李中杰 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206  
赖圣杰 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206  
金连梅 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206  
张洪龙 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206  
叶楚楚 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206  
赵丹 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206  
孙乔 上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心  
吕炜 广西壮族自治区疾病预防控制中心  
马家奇 中国疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102206  
王劲峰 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所  
兰亚佳 四川大学华西公共卫生学院 lanyajia@sina.com 
摘要点击次数: 2845
全文下载次数: 1463
中文摘要:
      目的 了解国家传染病自动预警系统(预警系统)在全国的运行情况,为推进其应用提供依据.方法 对2008年7月1日至2010年6月30日预警系统产生的预警信号量、信号响应率、响应时间、信号核实方式及响应结果进行描述性分析.结果 全国范围内,预警系统中28种传染病共产生533 829条预警信号,信号响应率为97.13%,平均响应时间为1.1 h.其中,固定阈值预警方法产生2472条预警信号,涉及9种传染病,通过初步核实、现场调查与实验室检测,排除2202条预警信号,最终确认霍乱246例、鼠疫15例和人感染高致病性禽流感9例以及39起霍乱暴发事件;移动百分位数法共产生531 357条预警信号,涉及19种传染病,全国平均每县每周约产生预警信号1.65条,其中6603条信号(1.24%)经初步核实后判断为疑似事件,经过进一步现场调查最终确认1594起暴发.预警系统中各病种的疑似事件信号占总预警信号的比例与暴发相关病例占总报告病例数的比例成正相关(r=0.963,P<0.01).结论预警系统中预警信号响应率和响应及时性较高,预警信号可作为传染病暴发的提示信息.
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the results of application on China Infectious Diseases Automated-alert and Response System(CIDARS)and for further improving the system. Methods Amount of signal, proportion of signal responded, time to signal response, manner of signal verification and the outcome of each signal in CIDARS were descriptively analyzed from July 1,2008to June 30, 2010. Results A total of 533 829 signals were generated nationwide on 28 kinds of infectious diseases in the system. 97.13% of the signals had been responded and the median time to response was 1.1 hours. Among them, 2472 signals were generated by the fixed-value detection method which involved 9 kinds of diseases after the preliminary verification, field investigation and laboratory tests. 2202 signals were excluded, and finally 246 cholera cases, 15 plague cases and 9H5N1 cases as well as 39 outbreaks of cholera were confirmed. 531 357 signals were generated by the other method - the 'moving percentile method' which involved 19 kinds of diseases. The average amount of signal per county per week was 1.65, with 6603 signals(1.24%)preliminarily verified as suspected outbreaks and 1594 outbreaks were finally confirmed by further field investigation. For diseases in CIDARS, the proportion of signals related to suspected outbreaks to all triggered signals showed a positive correlation with the proportion of cases related to outbreaks of all the reported cases (r=0.963, P<0.01). Conclusion The signals of CIDARS were responded timely, and the signal could act as a clue for potential outbreaks, which helped enhancing the ability on outbreaks detection for local public health departments.
查看全文   Html全文     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭