文章摘要
方艳,宋铁,李灵辉,代吉亚,易建荣,傅军华,谢雪妹,林锦炎.广东省传染病自动预警系统运行现状分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2013,34(8):800-803
广东省传染病自动预警系统运行现状分析
Current situation on the China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System in Guangdong province, China
收稿日期:2013-04-23  出版日期:2014-09-03
DOI:
中文关键词: 传染病|预警系统
英文关键词: Infectious disease|Early-warning system
基金项目:广东省"十二五"医学重点学科(公共卫生应急管理);广东省医学科研基金指令性课题(C2013003)
作者单位E-mail
方艳  fy95@163.com 
宋铁   
李灵辉   
代吉亚   
易建荣   
傅军华   
谢雪妹   
林锦炎  linjinyan@cdep.org.cn 
摘要点击次数: 2301
全文下载次数: 859
中文摘要:
      目的 分析广东省传染病自动预警系统(CIDARS)运行现状.方法 分析CIDARS三种预警方法的预警信号数与响应时间,并比较调整前后的预警信号阳性率、错误预警率.结果 2008年4月21日至2012年12月31日,广东省共发出114 585条预警信号,平均响应时间为1.35 h.其中固定阈值法发出12 394条预警信号,阳性率为7.96%;移动百分位数法发出85727条预警信号,阳性率为0.85%;累积和控制图法发出16 464条预警信号,阳性率为1.82%.报告病例数与预警信号数呈正相关(r=0.924,P<0.01).2010年中国疾病预防控制中心对CIDARS调整后,广东省预警信号阳性率从1.48%升至2.14%,甲型肝炎、细菌性和阿米巴性痢疾、伤寒和副伤寒等8种传染病的错误预警率下降.结论 CIDARS预警信号响应及时,运行状况良好;CIDARS调整后预警效能提高,但-些功能和参数仍需调整和完善.
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the current situation on China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS) in Guangdong province,China.Methods Earlywarning signals and response time were analyzed by using three approaches of CIDARS.Positive rates of early-warning signals and error early-warning rates prior and after the adjustment,were compared.Results Totally,114 585 early-warning signals appeared,with an average response time of 1.35 hours from April 21,2008 to December 31,2012.There were 12 394 early-warning signals in terms of fixed threshold method with a positive rate of 7.96%.85 727 early-warning signals appeared under the mobile percentile method with a positive rate of 0.85%.There were 16 464 early-warning signals by using accumulation and control chart methods,with a positive rate of 1.82%.Results showed there was a positive correlation between the number of reported cases and the number of early-warning signals (r.=0.924,P< 0.01).The overall positive rate in Guangdong province increased from 1.48% to 2.14%,after the adjustment done by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention in 2010.The error early-warning rates regarding eight infectious diseases including hepatitis A,bacillary or amebic dysentery,both typhoid and paratyphoid fevers had reduced.Conclusion The early-warning signal response appeared timely in CIDARS with good operation.However,despite the improvement on the efficacy of CIDARS,some functions and parameters of the systems still need to be adjusted.
查看全文   Html全文     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭