张雨格,吴晶,封磊,袁剑敏,许恩佩,潘安.中年含糖饮料摄入频率与老年认知障碍的关系[J].中华流行病学杂志,2020,41(1):55-61 |
中年含糖饮料摄入频率与老年认知障碍的关系 |
Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption in midlife and risk of late-life cognitive impairment in Chinese adults |
收稿日期:2019-03-26 出版日期:2020-01-14 |
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.01.011 |
中文关键词: 含糖饮料 认知障碍 队列研究 |
英文关键词: Sugar-sweetened beverages Cognitive impairment Cohort study |
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0907504);新加坡卫生部(NMRC/CSA/0055/2013);美国国立卫生研究院(UM1 CA182876,R01 CA144034) |
|
摘要点击次数: 4273 |
全文下载次数: 1650 |
中文摘要: |
目的 探究中年时期含糖饮料摄入频率与老年认知障碍风险的关系。方法 对来自新加坡华族健康队列的16 948名研究对象进行16~23年(平均20年)的随访,研究对象的含糖饮料摄入信息于基线调查获得(1993-1998年),研究对象的认知状态通过第3次随访期间(2014-2016年)在新加坡人群中校正过的简易智力状态检查量表获得。采用多元logistic线性回归模型分析含糖饮料摄入频率与认知障碍风险的关系。结果 在纳入的研究对象中,2 443名存在认知障碍。在控制了年龄、性别、籍贯、文化程度、生活方式(包括饮食因素)和疾病信息后,含糖饮料摄入频率与认知障碍风险关联无统计学意义。与几乎不喝碳酸饮料组相比,每周摄入碳酸饮料≥ 2次(OR=0.91,95%CI:0.77~1.08)、每周摄入1次(OR=1.00,95%CI:0.82~1.23)和每月摄入1~3次(OR=0.94,95%CI:0.80~1.09)的研究对象认知障碍发生风险差异无统计学意义(趋势性P=0.306)。与几乎不喝果(蔬)汁组相比,每周摄入果(蔬)汁≥ 2次(OR=1.03,95%CI:0.88~1.20)、每周摄入1次(OR=0.96,95%CI:0.82~1.12)和每月摄入1~3次(OR=0.94,95%CI:0.82~1.08)的研究对象的认知障碍发生风险均无统计学差异(趋势性P=0.930)。分层分析及敏感性分析对研究结果都没有实质改变。结论 在平均含糖饮料摄入频率较低的新加坡籍华人中,中年时期含糖饮料摄入频率与老年认知障碍风险差异无统计学意义。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To evaluate whether midlife consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), including juices and soft drinks, were associated with late-life cognitive impairment in Chinese adults. Methods Follow up was conducted for participants from Singapore Chinese Health Study, a population-based prospective cohort, for 16-23 (mean 20) years. The information about their SSBs consumption were collected at baseline survey from 1993 to 1998 by using a validated food frequency questionnaire and their cognition status were evaluated by using a Singapore-modified Mini-Mental State Examination Scale in the 3rd follow-up visit during 2014-2016. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the ORs and 95%CIs. Results A total of 16 948 participants were included in the analysis and 2 443 of them were identified as cognitive impairment using education-specific cutoffs. Sex, age, ancestral home, education level, physical activity level, total diet fiber intake level, BMI, alcohol drinking were significantly associated with cognitive impairment (P<0.05). After adjusted the above variables, potential dietary variables and disease status, no significant association was observed between SSBs consumption and cognitive impairment (P>0.05). Compared with those who never or hardly ever drank soft drinks, no significant differences in cognitive impairment risk were observed for those who drank soft drinks 2 or more times a week (OR=0.91, 95%CI:0.77-1.08), those who drank 1 time a week (OR=1.00, 95%CI:0.82-1.23) and those who drank 1-3 times a month (OR=0.94, 95%CI:0.80-1.09) (trend P=0.306). Compared with those who never or hardly ever drank juices, no significant differences in cognitive impairment risk were observed for those who drank juices 2 or more times a week (OR=1.03, 95%CI:0.88-1.20), those who drank 1 time a week (OR=0.96, 95%CI:0.82-1.12) and those who drank 1-3 times a month (OR=0.94, 95%CI:0.82-1.08) (trend P=0.930). No significant interactions were found with age, sex, and BMI status. Conclusion SSBs consumption in midlife was not significantly associated with risk of late-life cognitive impairment in Singaporean Chinese adults with relatively low consumption levels. Further researches are needed to verify the results. |
查看全文
Html全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
关闭 |
|
|
|