| 缪珂,高文静,秦雪英,吴涛,詹思延.《流行病学》课程思政资源库建设指标的研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2023,44(9):1473-1479 |
| 《流行病学》课程思政资源库建设指标的研究 |
| Research on indicators of ideological and political resource database construction for curriculum of “Epidemiology” |
| 收稿日期:2023-03-23 出版日期:2023-09-14 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230323-00173 |
| 中文关键词: 课程思政 资源库 流行病学 德尔菲法 |
| 英文关键词: Curriculum ideology and politics Resource library Epidemiology Delphi method |
| 基金项目:北京大学医学部教育教学研究课题（2021YB36） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1979 |
| 全文下载次数: 583 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 构建针对《流行病学》教材的课程思政资源库建设指标。方法 利用德尔菲专家法对来自4所高校及1个出版社的15名专家进行2轮专家函询，计算指标重要性和可行性得分与专家意见集中程度、协调程度。结果 2轮函询后，专家积极系数为100.00%（15/15），专家权威系数均为0.83，2轮函询Kendall's W分别为0.27（P<0.05）和0.33（P<0.05）。最终得到包含4项一级指标与31项二级指标的《流行病学》课程思政资源库建设指标。结论 本研究函询过程具有科学性，构建的《流行病学》课程思政资源库建设指标具有一定的权威性，可促进《流行病学》课程思政资源库建立。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To construct indicators of the ideological and political resource database construction for the curriculum of "Epidemiology". Methods Two rounds of expert consultation were conducted in 15 experts from 4 universities and 1 textbook publishing house using the Delphi method, and the importance and feasibility scores of the indicators were calculated with the degree of concentration and coordination of experts' opinions. Results In the two rounds of consultation, the experts' positive coefficient of the two questionnaires were both 100.00% (15/15), the authoritative coefficients of experts were both 0.83, and the Kendall's W was 0.27 (P<0.05) and 0.33 (P<0.05), respectively. Consensus was reached on 4 primary indicators and 31 secondary indicators. Conclusion The process of this study is scientific, and the indicators for the construction of ideological and political resource database for the curriculum of "Epidemiology" are authoritative, which can promote the establishment of ideological and political resource database for the curriculum of "Epidemiology". |
|
查看全文
Html全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
