文章摘要
杨萱,孙燕,霍玉奇,刘金瑾,张晓华,赵淑娴,赵清霞,张雪,王艳,陈昭云.河南省抗病毒治疗失败的艾滋病患者耐药特征[J].中华流行病学杂志,2023,44(11):1795-1801
河南省抗病毒治疗失败的艾滋病患者耐药特征
Characteristics of drug resistance in HIV/AIDS patients with antiretroviral treatment failure in Henan Province
收稿日期:2023-05-05  出版日期:2023-11-17
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230505-00279
中文关键词: 艾滋病病毒  抗病毒治疗失败  基因型耐药  耐药特征
英文关键词: HIV  Antiretroviral treatment failure  Genotypic drug resistance  Characteristics of drug resistance
基金项目:河南省医学科技攻关省部共建项目(SB201903030);2023年河南省重点研发与推广专项(232102311081)
作者单位E-mail
杨萱 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
孙燕 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
霍玉奇 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
刘金瑾 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
张晓华 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
赵淑娴 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
赵清霞 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
张雪 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
王艳 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015  
陈昭云 郑州市第六人民医院, 郑州 450015 chenzhaoyun@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 1793
全文下载次数: 491
中文摘要:
      目的 对河南省艾滋病患者抗病毒治疗(ART)失败后的基因型耐药检测,分析ART失败的耐药特征。方法 研究对象为2018年1月至2021年5月河南省18个城市接受ART时间≥6个月且病毒载量≥1 000拷贝数/ml艾滋病患者,收集艾滋病患者血液样本、社会人口学特征和ART信息。采用In-house方法进行HIV-1基因型耐药检测,将基因序列提交到美国斯坦福HIV-1耐药数据库分析耐药突变位点和药物耐药情况。结果 在887例ART失败的艾滋病患者中,样本成功扩增率为91.54%(812/887),总耐药率为83.25%(676/812),其中核苷类反转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)、非核苷类反转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)、蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)和整合酶抑制剂(INSTIs)的耐药率分别为73.40%(596/812)、80.54%(654/812)、5.54%(45/812)和2.56%(17/663),4类药物的耐药率差异有统计学意义(χ2=1 686.34,P<0.001),对2类药物同时耐药率为66.38%(539/812),对3类药物同时耐药率为5.79%(47/812)。共检出9个HIV-1基因亚型,以B亚型为主(59.61%,484/812),其次是CRF01_AE亚型(22.17%,180/812)和CRF07_BC亚型(9.48%,77/812),不同基因亚型的耐药率差异有统计学意义(χ2=21.33,P=0.001)。NRTIs相关突变位点中,M184V/I突变率最高(63.42%,515/812),其次是K65R(27.46%,223/812);NNRTIs相关突变位点中,突变率位居前3位的是K103N/S(34.98%,284/812)、G190A/S(26.11%,212/812)和V106M/I(24.63%,200/812);PIs相关突变位点中,突变率位居前3位的是M46I(4.31%,35/812)、V82A/F(3.82%,31/812)和I54V/MV(3.69%,30/812);INSTIs相关突变位点中,E157Q/EQ突变率最高(3.47%,23/663),其次是R263K和G140A(均为0.75%,5/663)。在NRTIs中,拉米夫定和恩曲他滨以高度耐药为主(65.52%,532/812);在NNRTIs中,奈韦拉平(77.46%,629/812)和依非韦伦(71.18%,578/812)以高度耐药为主;在PIs中,洛匹那韦/利托那韦中/高度耐药占比仅为4.19%(34/812);在INSTIs中,艾维雷韦和拉替拉韦中、高度耐药分别占1.66%(11/663)和1.21%(8/663),未发现比克替拉韦和多替拉韦的高度耐药。结论 河南省艾滋病患者ART失败的耐药率高,表现以NRTIs和NNRTIs耐药率高、耐药突变多样且复杂为特点。建议选择高耐药屏障药物,同时加强ART后病毒载量和耐药监测。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the drug resistance characteristics of HIV/AIDS patients in Henan Province with antiretroviral treatment (ART) failure through the genotypic drug resistance detection. Methods Blood samples were collected from HIV/AIDS patients who received ART for more than 6 months with viral loads ≥ 1 000 copies/ml in 18 cities of Henan from January 2018 to May 2021. The genotypic drug resistance detection was conducted by using an In-house drug resistance detection method. The drug resistance mutation (DRM) and antiretroviral susceptibility were analyzed by submitting the determined sequences to the Stanford HIV-1 drug resistance database. The information about patients' demographic characteristics and antiviral treatment data were collected. Results A total of 887 HIV/AIDS patients with ART failure, 812 sequences were successfully amplified with the success rate of 91.54%. In the 812 patients, 676 were drug resistant (83.25%, 676/812). The drug resistance ratesto nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) were 73.40% (596/812), 80.54% (654/812), 5.54% (45/812), and 2.56% (17/663), respectively. There were significant differences in drug resistance rates among four types of drugs (χ2=1 686.34, P<0.001). The drug resistance rate to two drugs was 66.38% (539/812), and the drug resistance rate to three drugs was 5.79% (47/812). A total of 9 subtypes of HIV-1were detected, in which subtype B accounted for 59.61%(484/812), followed by subtype CRF01_AE (22.17%, 180/812) and subtype CRF07_BC (9.48%, 77/812). There were significant differences in drug resistance rate among different subtypes (χ2=21.33, P=0.001). Among NRTIs related mutation sites, the DRM rate of M184V/I was highest (63.42%, 515/812), followed by K65R (27.46%, 223/812). The top three DRM rates were detected for K103N/S (34.98%, 284/812), G190A/S (26.11%, 212/812) and V106M/I (24.63%, 200/812) among NNRTIs related mutation sites, and M46I (4.31%, 35/812), V82A/F (3.82%, 31/812), and I54V/MV (3.69%, 30/812) among PIs related mutation sites. While among INSTIs related mutation sites, E157Q/EQ had the highest DRM rate (3.47%, 23/663), followed by R263K (0.75%, 5/663) and G140A (0.75%, 5/663). The resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine of NRTIs was at high-level (65.52%, 532/812), and the resistance to nevirapine (77.46%, 629/812) and efavirenz (71.18%, 578/812) of NNRTIs was also at high-level. The medium/high-level resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir of PIs was only 4.19% (34/812), the medium/high-level resistance to elvitegravir and raltegravir of INSTIs was 1.66% (11/663) and 1.21% (8/663), respectively, and no high-level resistance to bictegravir or dolutegravir was found. Conclusions The drug resistance in HIV/AIDS patients with ART failure was high in Henan, characterized by high drug resistance rates to NRTIs and NNRTIs, and diverse and complex resistance mutations. So high resistance barrier ART-regimens were recommended, and the viral load monitoring and drug resistance testing after ART should be strengthened.
查看全文   Html全文     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭