Abstract
薛英杰,吴系科,张衍文.流行病学研究数据质量评价方法的探讨[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,1985,6(3):166-169
流行病学研究数据质量评价方法的探讨
An Exploration on the Measurement-error and evaluation of the Epidemiologic Data
  
DOI:
KeyWord: 
English Key Word: 
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliation
Xue Yingjie 安徽医学院流行病学教研室 
吴系科 安徽医学院流行病学教研室 
张衍文 安徽医学院流行病学教研室 
Hits: 1288
Download times: 503
Abstract:
      本文应用"个体内"相关系数和Kendall相关系数作为估计定量数据和等级数据可靠度的指标,评价太湖。岳西中学学生血压流行病学研究数据的质量。结果表明,在定量数据中,体重、身高的可靠度最高(0.992-0.996),实验室数据次之(0.86~0.96),血压较低(SBP0.77~0.79;DBPⅣ0.72~0.76;DBPV0.29)。在等级数据中,父母文化水平可靠度较高(0.94~0.98),家庭经济收入次之(0.61),精神行为因素较低(0.29~0.45)。本文建议医学研究论文中除应报告实验设计和观察方法之外,还有必要评价研究数据的质量。
English Abstract:
      Measurement error and reliability of epidemiologic data in two middle schools in Taihu and Yuexi counties have been studied, in which intra-Person standard deviation was used to estimate measurement error and intra-person correlation coefficient relia-, bility respectively. In qualitative data, those of weight and height showed greatest reliability(0.992 for weight, 0.996 for height), followed by laboratory variables (0.86-0.96), and BP variables came last (0.77-0.79 for SBP, 0.72-0.76 for DBP, 0.29 DBP).Among ranked data,those of the education level of the parents were highest (0.94-0.98) psychological and behavioral variables lowest (0.29-0.45), with family income in between (0.61). Accordingly, it is suggested that the quality of data should be estimated in research papers besides presentation of the design and methods of study.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close