| 李竹,郝玲,钟海林,连志浩.两种出生缺陷监测方法中缺陷率的比较研究[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,1990,11(2):96-99 |
| 两种出生缺陷监测方法中缺陷率的比较研究 |
| Comparison of Birth Defects Prevalence Rates between Hospital and Community Based Surveillance Data |
| Received:March 22, 1988 Revised:December 05, 1988 |
| DOI： |
| KeyWord: 出生缺陷 监测 高危妊娠 |
| English Key Word: Birth defects Surveillance High risk pregnancy |
| FundProject: |
|
| Hits: 1804 |
| Download times: 605 |
| Abstract: |
| 我们利用河北省沧州地区1986年出生缺陷监测资料分析比较了以医院为基础和以人群为基础监测的出生缺陷率的关系。1986年沧州地区监测7 742例总出生,其中在县级及以上医院出生4 245,占监测总数的55%,非医院出生3497,占45%。分析结果发现,医院监测的出生缺陷率为30.9%,人群监测的出生缺陷率为10.5‰,二者之间的差别有显著意义(P<0.05),医院监测出生缺陷率较人群监测缺陷率高可能主要与在医院分娩产妇中高危妊娠的比例较一般人群大,而且高危妊娠中畸形儿的发现率较高有关,医院与人群监测的缺陷率之间的定量关系及各因素的影响作用有待进一步研究。 |
| English Abstract: |
| Birth defects surveillance (BDS) data of Cangzhou area, Hebei province in 1986 was studied to compare the prevalence rate from hospital based data(HBD) with that from community based data (CBD). of 7 742 total births, 4 245 (55%) were born in the county hospitals and above, and 3 497 (45%) in the township hospials and homes. The birth defects prevalence rate (BDPR) from HBD was 30.9 per 1 000 total births, while that from CBD was 10.5 per 1 000 total births. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). It was found that the higher BDPR from HBD was associated with the greater percentage of high risk pregnancies who delivered at the hospitals and who had higher risk of birth defects. The relationship of BDPRs between HBD and CBD, and others potential related factors need to be further studied. |
|
View Fulltext
Html FullText
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|