Abstract
张业武,陶芳标,尹惠萍,朱晓明,计国平,孔圣华,宋清华,陈建华,储诚志,李竹.安徽省2周岁内母乳与非母乳喂养儿童血清维生素A水平比较分析[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2006,27(4):302-306
安徽省2周岁内母乳与非母乳喂养儿童血清维生素A水平比较分析
Differences in serum retinol level between the breastfed and non-breastfed children aged 0 to 23 months
Received:May 23, 2005  Revised:May 23, 2005
DOI:
KeyWord: 母乳喂养  维生素A缺乏  辅食添加
English Key Word: Breastfeeding  Vitamin A deficiency  Complementary foods supplementations
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliation
ZHANG Yewu 100083, 北京大学生育健康研究所 
TAO Fangbiao 安徽省医科大学儿少卫生和妇幼卫生系 
YIN Huiping 安徽省妇幼保健所 
ZHU Xiaoming 安徽省妇幼保健所 
JI Guoping 安徽省妇幼保健所 
KONG Shenghua 安徽省妇幼保健所 
SONG Qinghua 安徽省妇幼保健所 
CHEN Jianhua 安徽省妇幼保健所 
CHU Chengzhi 安徽省妇幼保健所 
LI Zhu 100083, 北京大学生育健康研究所 
Hits: 3525
Download times: 1208
Abstract:
      目的了解母乳与非母乳喂养儿童中血清维生素A水平是否存在差异以及造成差异可能原因。方法研究数据来自人群为基础的儿童维生素A营养状况横断面调查,共调查401名 0-23月龄儿童。采用改良的荧光方法测定血清中视黄醇含量来反映维生素A水平,通过问卷方法调查儿童的家庭社会经济、围产期保健、2周内患病情况;半定量膳食频率问卷调查前1周内儿童膳食情况。利用SAS 8.1软件进行统计分析。结果 401名2岁内儿童中,母乳喂养率为50.37%;非母乳喂养组维生素A平均水平为(30.67±0.57)μg/dl,母乳喂养组为(27.60±0.56)μg/dl,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);在控制其他因素影响后,调整后的非母乳喂养组均值为(31.82±0.98)μg/dl, 母乳喂养组为(29.46±0.96)μg/dl,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。按年龄组分层分析显示,0月龄~、6月龄~、12月龄~和18月龄~组的母乳喂养率分别92.1%、70.1%、32.0%和17.1%。各年龄组内两组间(非母乳喂养组-母乳喂养组)维生素A均值差值及其95%可信区间(CI)分别为4.70 (-2.52-1.92)、0.82(-2.32-3.95)、2.95(-0.68-6.58)和6.05(2.34-9.77)μg/dl;控制其他混杂因素后,调整后的两组均值差值及其95%CI分别为0.00(-7.18-7.19)、1.35(-1.76-4.45)、 2.92(-0.82-6.65)和4.26(0.71-7.81)μg/dl;调整前、后只有18月龄组非母乳喂养组和母乳喂养组维生素A水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。趋势x2检验表明12月龄以后母乳喂养儿童辅食添加频率均比非母乳喂养儿童低。结论与非母乳喂养儿童相比,母乳喂养儿童的体内维生素A水平有所降低,但差别只是局限在18月龄以后儿童中。母乳中维生素A含量不足以及辅食添加不充分可能是造成这种差异潜在原因。控制人群中维生素A缺乏应该采取综合干预措施。
English Abstract:
      Objective Some recent studies found that high prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in the breastfed children. This study aimed to understand the differences in serum retinol level between breastfed and bottle-fed children aged 0 to 23 months and the possible causes of low level of serum retinol for the breastfed children. Methods Data for children aged 0 to 23 months were extracted from a population-based cross sectional study for vitamin A nutrition status. Fluorescence method was used to measure the serum retinol. Mothers or caregivers were asked to answer a pre-designed questionnaire and socioeconomic status, peri-natal care, breastfeeding status, morbidity histories and other related factors were collected. Semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was used to investigate the child's dietary intake one week prior to the survey. Data were analyzed using SAS 8. 1. Results Of 401 children aged 0 to 23 months, the breastfeeding rate was 50.37% . The means of the serum retinol level between bottle-fed (30.67±0.57) μg/dl and the breastfed children (27.60±0.56)μg/dl was significantly different(P<0.01). The corresponding figures were (31.82±0.98)μg/dl and (29.46±0.96)μg/dl after adjustment for confounders, which also showed significant difference (P<0.01). After stratified by age groups, the breastfeeding rates in the 0~, 6~, 12~ and 18~months groups were 92.1%, 70.1%, 32.0% and 17.1%, respectively. We calculated the difference in means of the serum retinol level between the bottle-fed and breastfed children for each of four age groups, and the 95% confidence limits of the differences. The differences in means and the 95 % confidence limits for 0~, 6~, 12~ and 18~months group were 4.70 μg/dl (-2.52~1.92),0.82 μg/dl(-2.32~3.95), 2.95 μg/dl (-0.68~6.58) and 6.05 μg/dl (2.34~9.77), respectively. After adjustment for confounders and covariates,the adjusted figures were 0.00 μg/dl(-7.18~7.19),1.35 μg/dl(-1.76~4.45),2.92 μg/dl(-0.82~6.65) and 4.26 μg/dl(0.71~7.81),respectively. The significant difference in means of serum retinol level was only found in the 18~months group before or after adjustments (P0.01 for both). The Cochrane-Atmitage chi square trend test showed that the breastfed children tended to have lower frequencies of complementary dietary intakes than that of the bottle-fed aged 12 months and above. Conclusions The breastfed children aged 0 to 23 months had relative low serum retinol level while compared with the bottle-fed. However, the significant differences seemed to be only confined to those aged 18 months and above. Low level of vitamin A in breast milk and low frequent complimentary food supplements might have served as the potential for the differences.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close