| 张之伦,王旭,朱向军,张颖,刘研,高志刚,梁苗,李琳,李佳萌,刘荣凯,董晓静,宋广新,张道昌,王文权,韩永刚,陈江婷.成年人连续三批次流感裂解疫苗接种的安全性、免疫原性观察[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2009,30(6):583-587 |
| 成年人连续三批次流感裂解疫苗接种的安全性、免疫原性观察 |
| Safety and immunogenicity on three lots of influenza split vaccines among adults |
| Received:January 14, 2009 |
| DOI： |
| KeyWord: 流感裂解疫苗 免疫原性 安全性 |
| English Key Word: Influenza split vaccine Immunogenicity Safety |
| FundProject:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30518001/CO301070202);香港研究资助局资助项目(N-HKU720/05) |
| Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | | ZHANG Zhi-lun | Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China | hrmrlth@hkucc.hku.hk | | WANG Xu | 北京科兴生物制品有限公司 | | | ZHU Xiang-jun | Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China | | | ZHANG Ying | Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China | | | LIU Yan | 北京科兴生物制品有限公司 | | | GAO Zhi-gang | Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China | | | LIANG Miao | Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China | | | LI Lin | Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China | | | LI Jia-meng | Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China | | | LIU Rong-kai | 天津市汉沽区卫生防病站 | | | DONG Xiao-jing | 天津市汉沽区卫生防病站 | | | SONG Guang-xin | 天津市大港区卫生防病站 | | | ZHANG Dao-chang | 天津市大港区卫生防病站 | | | WANG Wen-quan | 天津市大港区卫生防病站 | | | HAN Yong-gang | 天津市大港区卫生防病站 | | | CHEN Jiang-ting | 北京科兴生物制品有限公司 | |
|
| Hits: 3976 |
| Download times: 1430 |
| Abstract: |
| 目的 评价流感裂解疫苗安尔来福TM的安全性和免疫原性,考核疫苗生产工艺的稳定性.方法 采用随机双盲设对照的临床试验设计,试验疫苗为连续三个批次的安尔来福TM,以进口疫苗为对照.受试者为566名18～60岁健康成年人,按照4个年龄层随机分配到4个试验组,疫苗含甲1型、甲3型和乙型流感病毒抗原各15 μg.免疫程序为1针,接种后进行30 min即时反应观察以及24、48、72 h的随访观察,免疫前及免疫后第21天采血,将成对血清设盲后进行血凝抑制(HI)抗体检测.结果 受试者以轻度不良反应为主,各试验组发热反应发生率为1.4%～2.8%,组间差异无统计学意义.4个组3个型别HI抗体阳转率均≥80.3%,GMT增长倍数≥11.1,抗体保护率≥93.4%.三个批次安尔来福TM3个型别的HI抗体阳转率、GMT增长倍数及血清抗体保护率均超过欧盟及美国FDA标准.结论 连续三批次安尔来福TM具有良好的免疫原性和安全性,疫苗生产工艺稳定. |
| English Abstract: |
| Objective To evaluate the irnmunogenicity, safety and stability of the manufacture process regarding three consecutive lots of influenza split vaccines (Anflu ). Methods A double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted in healthy volunteers. A total of 566 subjects aged 18 to 60 years were recruited and stratified into four age groups before randomly assigned into four groups. Each group would receive one dose of influenza vaccine from either one of the three lots ofAnflu or one lot of the licensed control vaccine. Each dose of the vaccines contained 15 μg of each of the H1N1, H3N2 and B type antigen. Safety was assessed through 30-minute observation for immediate allergic reaction and three-day observation after vaccination. HI antibody titers were determined before vaccination and on day 21, after vaccination. Results Mild adverse reaction was reported and the overall incidence rates on fever of the four groups were from 1.4% to 2.8% but no significant difference was observed between groups. Seroconversion rates of the three viral strains in four groups were 80.3% and above with fold increase as≥11.1 and protection rate was≥93.4%. For the three lots of investigated vaccines, all of the indexes of the three viral strains in four groups exceeded the standards on EMEA and FDA for influenza vaccine. Conclusion The three consecutive lots of Anflu appeared to be good, with both consistent immunogenieity and safety, indicating the stability of manufacture process. |
|
View Fulltext
Html FullText
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|