Abstract
胡国清,朱松林,王琦琦,陈田木,谭爱春,何琼,刘鑫,徐玲.中国五岁以下儿童非致死性伤害发生率及影响因素研究[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2011,32(8):773-776
中国五岁以下儿童非致死性伤害发生率及影响因素研究
An epidemiological survey on the incidence of non-fatal injury and influencing factors among children under 5 years old in China
Received:March 16, 2011  
DOI:
KeyWord: 伤害,非致死性  儿童  发生率  影响因素
English Key Word: Injury,non-fatal  Child  Incidence  Influencing factors
FundProject:全国教育科学“十一五”规划青年课题(ELA080320);CMB/卫生部服务调查课题
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Hu Guo-qing Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410078,China  
Zhu Song-lin Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410078,China  
Wang Qi-qi Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410078,China  
Chen Tian-mu Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410078,China  
Tan Ai-chun Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410078,China  
He Qiong Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410078,China  
Liu Xin Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410078,China  
Xu Ling Information Center,Ministry of Health xuling@moh.gov.cn 
Hits: 2519
Download times: 1170
Abstract:
      目的<\b>了解中国5 岁以下儿童非致死性伤害的发生率及相关影响因素。方法<\b>数据来自于第四次国家卫生服务调查,其中5 岁以下儿童10 819 名,为本次研究对象。伤害相关内容:是否发生伤害以及发生次数、原因、地点、严重程度。采用两水平Poisson 回归分析社会经济学变量与非致死性伤害发生次数的关联性。结果最近12 个月内5 岁以下儿童非致死性伤害发生率为16.0‰。<1 岁组儿童非致死性伤害前3 位原因是:跌倒、动物咬伤、烧伤/烫伤,发生率分别为3.9‰、1.8‰和1.8‰;1~4 岁组儿童是:动物咬伤、跌倒、烧伤/烫伤,发生率分别为6.5‰、6.0‰和2.9‰。两年龄组儿童分别有83.0%和69.0%的最近一次伤害发生在家里。<1 岁组无残疾发生,1~4 岁组伤害致残疾率为1.0%。控制其他变量后,1~4 岁组中男童非致死性伤害风险是女童的1.57 倍(P<0.05);民族、家庭人均收入和地区等变量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);<1 岁组在全部社会经济学变量上的统计检验结果均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论中国5 岁以下儿童最近12 个月非致死性伤害发生率为16.0‰;动物咬伤、跌倒、烧伤/烫伤是非致死性伤害的前三位原因;家庭内是非致死性伤害最常见地点;1~4 岁男童非致死性伤害发生率明显高于女童。
English Abstract:
      Objective To determine the incidence of non-fatal injuries and related influencing factors among children under 5 years old in China.Methods Data involving 10 819 children under 5 years old was from the Fourth National Health Service Survey of China. Injury-related indicators include:history of ever having had an injury,its frequency,cause,location and severity of the injury. A two-level Poisson regression was used to examine the significance of related socio-economic variables.Results The overall incidence rate of nonfatal injuries among children under 5 years old was 16.0 per 1000 population in the prior 12 months. The first three leading causes of non-fatal injuries were falls,animal bite,fire/burn among children under 1 year old,with the rates as 3.9,1.8 and 1.8 per 1000 population,respectively. For children aged 1 to 4 years old,the first three leading causes were animal bite,fall,fire/burn with rates as 6.5,6.0 and 2.9 per 1000 population,respectively. 83.0% and 69.0% of last injuries occurred at home for the above said two age groups. No disability was found among children younger than 1 year old who suffered from a nonfatal injury while for the 1-4 age group,the disability accounted for 1.0% of injury-induced outcomes. After adjusting other variables, boys had 1.57 times the risk of injury compared with girls in the 1-4 age group(P<0.05). The differences on the effects regarding ethnicity,per capita household income,and place were insignificant (P>0.05). None of the socio-economic variables was found that significantly related to the non-fatal injury risk among children under 1 year old(P>0.05).Conclusion The incidence of nonfatal injuries among children under 5 years old was 16.0 per 1000 population in the prior 12 months. The three leading causes of injuries were animal bite,falls,fire/burn respectively. Home was the most common place that non-fatal injuries occurred. Boys had a higher risk of injury compared with girls among children aged 1 to 4 years old and the difference was significant.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close