Abstract
陈璐,樊俊宁,孙点剑一,李立明,吕筠.生物学年龄评价方法进展[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2021,42(9):1683-1688
生物学年龄评价方法进展
Progress in research of measurements of biological age
Received:December 10, 2020  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201210-01396
KeyWord: 生物学年龄  评价  比较
English Key Word: Biological age  Measurements  Comparison
FundProject:国家自然科学基金(81941018)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Chen Lu Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China  
Fan Junning Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China  
Sun Dianjianyi Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness & Response, Beijing 100191, China 
 
Li Liming Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness & Response, Beijing 100191, China 
 
Lyu Jun Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness & Response, Beijing 100191, China 
lvjun@bjmu.edu.cn 
Hits: 3746
Download times: 1901
Abstract:
      利用生物学年龄衡量个体的衰老进程,可以弥补实足年龄难以解释同龄个体间健康水平差异的缺陷。近年来,涌现出多种基于临床或表型、分子生物学指标或复合型指标的生物学年龄测量方法。本文对一些常见的生物学年龄评价指标进行概述,并比较这些评价指标的效度。
English Abstract:
      Biological age (BA) can be used to measure the aging process of individuals and make up for the deficiency that chronological age cannot explain the discrepancy of health status among individuals at same chronological age. In recent years, multiple measurements of BA based on clinical or phenotypic, molecular biological, or compound indicators have emerged. In the paper, we summarize some common measurements of BA and compare their validities.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close