| 陈坤,焦登鳌,卢琳,叶发松,雍泰巍,沈惠仙.流行病学信函调查方法的评价[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,1989,10(1):47-50 |
| 流行病学信函调查方法的评价 |
| Evaluation of Mailed Epidemiologic Inquiries |
| |
| DOI： |
| KeyWord: 流行病学调查方法 可靠性 调查表 |
| English Key Word: Epidemiologic survey methods Reliability Questionnaires |
| FundProject: |
| Author Name | Affiliation | | Chen Kun | Dept. of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Mendical University, Hangzhou | | 焦登鳌 | Dept. of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Mendical University, Hangzhou | | 卢琳 | Dept. of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Mendical University, Hangzhou | | 叶发松 | Dept. of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Mendical University, Hangzhou | | 雍泰巍 | Dept. of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Mendical University, Hangzhou | | 沈惠仙 | Dept. of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Mendical University, Hangzhou |
|
| Hits: 1042 |
| Download times: 259 |
| Abstract: |
| 信函调查是一种经济实用的流行病学调查方法。本文对信函调查和访问调查的资料作了比较和讨论,统计分析项目包括一般情况、身高体重、饮水情况、饮食习惯、烟酒嗜好、日常体力活动、医疗疾病史、双亲疾病史及经济收入等60余项,其中45项未见两次调查之间有显著差异,相关系数均极为显著;达到显著差异的16项主要集中在饮酒史、食油消耗量及经济收入等问题上,但其大部分仍呈正相关的关系(P<0.05)。信函调查的总应答率为87.1%。此外,对调查表也进行了审视和讨论。 |
| English Abstract: |
| The mailed inquiry is a economical and useful epidemiologic survey method. Comparison and discussion of data from the mailed inquiries and home interviewes were done. More than 60 items which included generel questions, height and weight, sources of drinking water, dietary habits, histories of smoking and alcohol consumption, physical activities, medical histories. parents medical histories and income were analysed, there was no significant difference in 45 items of the above data and a very significant relative coefficients between there two methods. Only 16 items which focused on alcohol and oil consumption, income, etc. had significant differences, but the most still had positive-relative correlation (P<0.05). The response rate of the mailed inquiries was 87.1 percent. In addition, the mailed questionnaire also was discussed. |
|
View Fulltext
Html FullText
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|