包头市农牧区老年人生活质量的研究

王素华; 李立明; 李俊; 王洪林; 韦丽琴

Abstract

王素华,李立明,李俊,王洪林,韦丽琴.包头市农牧区老年人生活质量的研究[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2001,22(3):205-207

包头市农牧区老年人生活质量的研究

Study on the quality of life among the elderly in the rural and pastoral districts in Baotou city

Received:September 01, 2000

DOI：

KeyWord: 老年人生活质量评价量表 SF-36

English Key Word: The elderly The short-form health survey questionnaire(SF-36)

FundProject:

Author Name	Affiliation
WANG Suhua	Department of Preventive Medicine, Baotou Medical Collage, Baotou 014010, China
LI Liming	北京大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室
LI Jun	北京大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室
王洪林	Department of Preventive Medicine, Baotou Medical Collage, Baotou 014010, China
韦丽琴	Department of Preventive Medicine, Baotou Medical Collage, Baotou 014010, China

Hits: 3466

Download times: 1253

Abstract:

目的　了解包头市农、牧区老年人生活质量的现状,分析其可能的影响因素,同时比较农、牧区老年人生活质量上存在的差异。方法　采用WHO推荐的生活质量评价量表SF 36 (theshort formhealthsurveyquestionnaire,SF 36 )入户访问调查。结果　①农、牧区老年人SF 36量表的加权总分分别为 6 4.16± 18.76和 73.94± 17.48,经年龄和性别调整后表现为牧区老年人得分高于农村老年人 (F =137.8,P <,0.0 0 1)。②多元线性回归分析结果表明 :影响农村老年人生活质量的主要因素有慢性病、年龄、就医情况、文化程度和性别。影响牧区老年人生活质量的因素主要有慢性病、就医情况、婚姻状况、年龄和经济收入。结论　从生活质量角度来看,没有文化、丧偶、收入低的老年人是社会的脆弱人群,在制订和实施卫生服务以及社会保障政策时应予以重点考虑

English Abstract:

Objective In order to explore the situation of QOL of the elderly in the rural and pastoral districts in Baotou city, to compare the differences of QOL between the two districts, and to find out the major factors influencing the QOL of the elderly.MethodsSF-36, recommended by WHO was adopted to study the QOL of 1 421 old people in the rural and pastoral districts in Baotou city.Results ①The average weighted score based on the SF-36 was 64.16±18.76 in the rural area district and 73.94±17.48 in the pastoral district (F =137.8, P <0.01).The level of QOL of the elderly in the pastoral district was significantly higherthan that in the rural district.② Results from the multiple liner regression analysis showed that the main factors influencing the QOL of the elderly were chronic disease, age,hospitalization, education and gender in the rural district, but chronic disease, age, hospitalization, income and marital status in the pastoral district.Conclusion Population with older age, low education, no spouse and low income should be viewed as the priority of attention and their special difficulties fully considered when setting up the policy of health care and social security.

View Fulltext Html FullText View/Add Comment Download reader