Abstract
刘兆兰,付朝伟,陈维清,王伟炳,徐飚.DTSQs量表在2型糖尿病患者中应用的信度、效度和反应度初步评价[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2008,29(8):823-827
DTSQs量表在2型糖尿病患者中应用的信度、效度和反应度初步评价
Using satisfaction questionnaire status version (DTSQs) to study on the reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of diabetes treatment among Chinese diabetic outpatients
Received:March 26, 2008  Revised:June 08, 2012
DOI:
KeyWord: 2型糖尿病  量表  信度  效度
English Key Word: Diabetes mellitus  type 2  Scale  Reliability  Validity
FundProject:国家重点发展计划“863”计划资助项目(2003AA208406)
Author NameAffiliation
LIU ZHAO-lan 复旦大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室,上海200032 
FU Chaowei 复旦大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室,上海200032 
CHEN wei-qing 中山大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室,上海200032 
WANG Weibing 复旦大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室,上海200032 
XU Biao 复旦大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室,上海200032 
Hits: 4130
Download times: 2408
Abstract:
      目的<\b>初步评价糖尿病治疗满意度问卷当前版(DTSQs)鼍表在中国2型糖尿病患者中应用的信度、效度和反应度。方法<\b>以上海市3家医院和广州市4家医院f】诊2型糖尿病病例为研究对象,采用中文版DTSQs问卷调查结合实验室检测的方法<\b>收集资料,应用信度分析、因子分析结合结构方程模型、多元协方差分析分别评价DTSQs的信度、效度和反应度。结果<\b> 满意度维度分半信度系数为0.807,Cronbach a系数为0.717;探索性因子分析结果<\b>酿示,3个公因子累计方差贡献窄为67.656%;拟合度检验结果<\b>硅示,相对T2=4.95,DK=0.18;不同性别、不同血糖控制水平组患者DTSQs量表3个维度得分向量不同。研究数据支持DTSOs量表的理论假设,中文版DTSQs量表具有较高的信度和结构效度。结论<\b>初步认为DTSQs量表中文版叮以在中国2型糖尿病患者中应用。
English Abstract:
      Objective Using 'diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire status version(DTSQs)'to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness, among Chinese type 2 diabeties mellitus (T2DM) outpatients Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in 749 T2DM outpatients from seven hospitals in Guangzhou and Shanghai, China. The DTSQs was self-administered by patients, under the help from interviewers for those having difficulties in reading. Split-half reliability correlation coefficient,Cronbaeh a and Spearman' were used to test the reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed separately to examine the construct validity of the scale.The responsiveness of the scale was appraised by the multiple analysis of covarianee (MANCOVA). Results The split-half correlation coefficient was 0.807 and the Cronbaeh a was 0.717 of the six items on satisfaction of treatment. The three factors extracted by EFA explained 67. 656 % of the overall variance.Tberelative χ2 was 4.95 and DK was 0.18 in the goodness of test by CFA. The vector of treatment satisfaction, perceived hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia were different in males versus females and in poor versus good blood glucose controlled groups. The DTSQs showed good reliability and validity among T2D Moutpatients. Conclusion DTSQs was applicable to Chinese T2DM patients.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close