Abstract
熊玮仪,倪大新,王子军.美国疾病预防控制中心和世界卫生组织传染病监测系统评价策略分析[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2010,31(7):781-785
美国疾病预防控制中心和世界卫生组织传染病监测系统评价策略分析
A discussion on the strategy of evaluating the communicable disease surveillance systems in US Center for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization
Received:February 09, 2010  
DOI:
KeyWord: 传染病  监测系统  评价
English Key Word: Communicable disease  Surveillance systems  Evaluation
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
XIONG Wei-yi Office for Disease Control and Emergency Response, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China  
NI Da-xin Office for Disease Control and Emergency Response, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China  
WANG Zi-jun Office for Disease Control and Emergency Response, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China zijunwang@sohu.com 
Hits: 3645
Download times: 1797
Abstract:
      目的对比分析美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)及WHO的监测系统评价方案,探讨适合中国的传染病监测系统评价策略.方法 系统收集美国CDC及WHO历年来提出的各版本监测系统评价方案,分析其主要思想和对中国的适用性;以现况分析和可行性分析探讨适合中国的传染病监测系统评价策略.结果 美国CDC提出的评价方案适于评价专病监测系统,重在对系统特征进行分析.WHO提出的评价方案适于评价国家或区域的整体监测体系,重在对系统功能进行分析.中国现阶段开展的监测系统评价多应用了特征评价的思想,也已初步具备功能评价的条件.结论 现阶段制定传染病监测系统评价策略时应参考美国CDC及WHO的各版本监测方案,并结合中国国情加以制定.
English Abstract:
      Objective To compare the different surveillance system evaluation guidelines proposed by US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and WHO, so as to develop an evaluation strategy suitable for communicable disease surveillance systems in China. Methods Systematic collection and review on the guidelines that were proposed by US CDC and WHO.Situation analysis together with feasibility analysis were linked to the analysis of evaluation strategy used in China. Results US CDC guidelines were more appropriate for evaluating those single or appropriate for evaluating the multi-system or complicated system which focusing on data related to moment to start to evaluate the functions. Conclusion More flexible and comprehensive strategy based on national conditions is needed when constitute the national communicable disease surveillance evaluation guidelines. The multi-step strategy described in this article could be used as reference.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close