应用社会网络分析法选择大学生性教育同伴教育者的研究

杨义; 邓华; 杨帆; 李彦霖

Abstract

杨义,邓华,杨帆,李彦霖.应用社会网络分析法选择大学生性教育同伴教育者的研究[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2016,37(12):1587-1591

应用社会网络分析法选择大学生性教育同伴教育者的研究

Selection of peer educators for sex education program-based on data from social network analysis among college freshmen students

Received:July 08, 2016

DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2016.12.007

KeyWord: 社会网络分析同伴教育性教育大学新生

English Key Word: Social network analysis Peer educators Sex education College freshmen

FundProject:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金（12YJC840050）；四川性社会学与性教育研究中心课题（SXJYB1403）

Author Name	Affiliation	E-mail
Yang Yi	Department of Social Medicine and Health Administration, School of Administration	thehanyang@163.com
Deng Hua	Department of Social Medicine and Health Administration, School of Administration
Yang Fan	Department of Students'Affairs, School of Medical Technology, School of University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China
Li Yanlin	Urology Department, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu 610017, China

Hits: 3859

Download times: 2674

Abstract:

目的通过社会网络调查与分析，结合“关键人物”本人意愿，确定性教育同伴教育者。方法 2014年3月通过自填式问卷调查，收集四川省成都市某中医药大学2个班119名大学新生人口学信息、个体社会网络以及“以班级为单位”的整体社会网络信息，运用SPSS 23.0软件对人口学信息进行描述分析，UCINET 6软件分析社会网络并绘制网络示意图。结果调查对象最主要的行为亲密和私密话题网络成员是大学同学，调查对象能够获得大学同学经济支持、与其外出玩耍和聊私密话题的比例分别为95.8%（114/119）、96.6%（115/119）和91.6%（109/119）。调查对象向大学同学寻求健康咨询的比例为89.1%（106/119）。2个班共确定性教育同伴教育者17人，其中10人为班干部。结论大学同学是大学生最重要的社会网络成员，社会网络分析可确定合适的同伴教育者。

English Abstract:

Objective Through combining the results from social network analysis and willingness of the key actors, peer educators for sex education among freshmen to select peer educators for sex education. Methods Self-developed questionnaires were used to collect information on related demographics, egocentric social networks and whole class-based unit-network. Descriptive analysis was applied. UCINET 6 was used to conduct social network analysis and to draw the whole networking graphs. Results Classmates appeared as the most important behavior intimate social network (95.8% claimed they could potentially borrow money from them, and 96.6% often went out with them) and were the most important members who could share privacy information with (91.6%) and consulting for private health information on (89.1%), among freshmen students in college. Finally, 17 freshmen were selected to have become peer educators, with 10 of them as the committee members in the class. Conclusion Classmates formed the most important social network among freshmen students in college. Social network analysis could be used to help identify the suitable peer educators.

View Fulltext Html FullText View/Add Comment Download reader