Abstract
于慧会,毕雪,刘运泳.中文版癌症患者报告结局的经济毒性量表信度和效度研究[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2017,38(8):1118-1120
中文版癌症患者报告结局的经济毒性量表信度和效度研究
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version on Comprehensive Scores for Financial Toxicity based on the patient-reported outcome measures
Received:December 15, 2016  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.08.024
KeyWord: 肿瘤  经济毒性  信度  效度
English Key Word: Neoplasm  Financial toxicity  Reliability  Validity
FundProject:辽宁省自然科学基金(2015020261)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Yu Huihui Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, China  
Bi Xue Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, China  
Liu Yunyong Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, China liuyunyong@cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com 
Hits: 7251
Download times: 2072
Abstract:
      目的 分析中文版经济毒性综合评分量表的信度和效度。方法 对118例癌症患者采用面对面问卷调查,间隔2周后采用同一量表选取部分患者复测,利用SPSS 16.0软件统计分析量表的内外部信度、内容和结构效度。Cronbach's α系数评价量表内部一致性,Pearson相关系数作为重测信度系数评价外在信度,采用内容效度指数方法定量评价内容效度,用探索性因子分析量表的结构效度。结果 量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.889,重测结果的Pearson相关系数为0.77~0.98,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。中文版COST量表内容效度指数为0.82,各条目的内容效度指数为0.83~1.00;探索性因子分析提取2个公因子,其累积贡献率为68.04%,各条目在相应因子上的因子载荷均>0.60。结论 中文版经济毒性综合评分量表具有较好的信度和效度,可应用于癌症人群研究。
English Abstract:
      Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version on comprehensive scores for financial toxicity (COST), based on the patient-reported outcome measures. Methods A total of 118 cancer patients were face-to-face interviewed by well-trained investigators. Cronbach's α and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate reliability. Content validity index (CVI) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to evaluate the content validity and construct validity, respectively. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient appeared as 0.889 for the whole questionnaire, with the results of test-retest were between 0.77 and 0.98. Scale-content validity index (S-CVI) appeared as 0.82, with item-content validity index (I-CVI) between 0.83 and 1.00. Two components were extracted from the Exploratory factor analysis, with cumulative rate as 68.04% and loading >0.60 on every item. Conclusion The Chinese version of COST scale showed high reliability and good validity, thus can be applied to assess the financial situation in cancer patients.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close