谢莉,刘秀荣,肖琳,裴迎新,杨杰,姜垣.2018年《北京市控制吸烟条例》在东城、朝阳区餐馆实施效果调查[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2019,40(7):775-778 |
2018年《北京市控制吸烟条例》在东城、朝阳区餐馆实施效果调查 |
Implementation of Beijing Tobacco Control Regulation in restaurants in Dongcheng and Chaoyang districts of Beijing, 2018 |
Received:November 20, 2018 |
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.07.008 |
KeyWord: 烟草控制 餐馆 效果 |
English Key Word: Tobacco control Restaurant Effectiveness |
FundProject:中国疾病预防控制中心烟草流行监测和控烟综合干预(131031001000160015) |
Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | Xie Li | Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China | | Liu Xiurong | Beijing Municipal Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China | | Xiao Lin | Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China | | Pei Yingxin | Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China | | Yang Jie | Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China | | Jiang Yuan | Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China | jiangyuan88@vip.sina.com |
|
Hits: 3071 |
Download times: 1353 |
Abstract: |
目的 评估《北京市控制吸烟条例》(《条例》)实施效果。方法 2018年4月通过分层阶段抽样方法,选择北京市东城、朝阳区93家餐馆,在午餐和晚餐时间进行暗访随访,观察餐馆内吸烟现象,并与实施前半年、实施1个月的结果进行比较。结果 餐馆禁烟标识张贴率(76.3%)和服务员对《条例》整体认知程度均较高。总体吸烟发生率(29.0%)低于实施前半年的吸烟率(36.7%),高于实施1个月的吸烟率(14.8%)。未发现服务员主动劝阻行为。商业建筑内餐馆吸烟发生率(3.3%)低于非商业建筑内餐馆(41.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 《条例》实施效果低于实施1个月。禁烟标识张贴率和服务员认知水平与法规实际遵守情况相背离。应加强对餐馆经营者和公众的宣传和教育。 |
English Abstract: |
Objective To evaluate the implementation effect of the Beijing Tobacco Control Regulation. Methods An observational study was conducted in a multi-stage randomly selected sample of 93 restaurants in Dongcheng and Chaoyang districts, Beijing. Undercover visits to the restaurants were paid by investigators at lunch or dinner time. The incidence of smoking behavior and the posters of no-smoking signs were observed, waiters were interviewed about awareness of the regulation, and comparisons with the baseline data of 6 months before and 1 month after regulation implementation were made. Results The pasting rate of no-smoking signs was 76.3%. The awareness of the regulation in the waiters surveyed was high. The incidence rate of smoking in restaurants (29.0%) was lower than that before the regulation implementation (36.7%), but it was significantly higher than that one month after regulation implementation (14.8%). No active interventions from the restaurant staff were observed when smoking occurred. The incidence of smoking in restaurants within commercial buildings (3.3%) was significantly lower than that in non-commercial buildings (41.3%), the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusions The effect of the regulation weakened 3 years after implementation compared with that in 1 month after the implementation. The enforcement degree of the regulation was conflicted with pasting rate of no-smoking signs and the regulation awareness level in waiters in restaurants in Dongcheng and Chaoyang districts. |
View Fulltext
Html FullText
View/Add Comment Download reader |
Close |
|
|
|