Abstract
殷召雪,朱晓磊,高欣,张晓畅,刘意,吴静.区域健康老龄化促进指数的构建研究[J].Chinese journal of Epidemiology,2021,42(12):2196-2200
区域健康老龄化促进指数的构建研究
Study on the establishment of regional healthy aging promotion index
Received:April 25, 2021  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210425-00340
KeyWord: 健康老龄化  指数  层次分析法
English Key Word: Healthy aging  Index  Analytic hierarchy process
FundProject:国家重点研发计划(2020YFC2003000)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Yin Zhaoxue Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Elderly Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China  
Zhu Xiaolei Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Elderly Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China  
Gao Xin Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Elderly Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China  
Zhang Xiaochang Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Elderly Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China  
Liu Yi Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Elderly Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha 410000, China 
 
Wu Jing National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China wujing@chinacdc.cn 
Hits: 2675
Download times: 1023
Abstract:
      目的 建立一个可以反映区域健康老龄化促进状况的指数。方法 利用专家咨询法构建指标体系,并利用层次分析法为各指标赋予权重,最终形成区域健康老龄化促进指数。结果 本研究建立了包括由人居环境、医疗服务、公共卫生、护理养老和保障体系5个一级指标和21个二级指标构成的区域健康老龄化促进指标体系。所构建的指标体系中,一级指标权重范围为0.073~0.346,其中人居环境和公共卫生的权重最大,分别为0.346和0.325,护理养老权重最小(0.073)。所有二级指标在整个指标体系中的综合权重范围为0.011~0.162。所有指标层次总排序的一致性比例为0.021,一致性检验合格。结论 本研究构建的区域健康老龄化促进指数具备较强的科学性、合理性,具有较好的适用性,可以用于区域健康老龄化促进状况的评估。
English Abstract:
      Objective To establish an index that can reflect the level of healthy aging promotion in a region. Methods Establish an indicators system using expert consultation and then determine the weight for each indicator using the analytic hierarchy process. Finally, we can get the regional healthy aging promotion index. Results Regional healthy aging promotion indicator system was established, including five first-level indicators (residence environment, medical service, public health, nurse and care, and supporting system) and 21 second-level indicators. The weight of every level-one indicator ranges from 0.073 to 0.346. Two indicators with the highest weight are residence environment and public health (0.346 and 0.325, respectively), while the indicator with the lowest weight is nurse and care (0.073). The importance of every level-two indicator ranges from 0.011 to 0.162. The consistency ratio of the regional healthy aging promotion index is 0.021, and the consistency test is qualified. Conclusion Regional healthy aging promotion index established in this study is very scientific, reasonable, and applicable. It can be used to evaluate the region's situation or level of healthy aging promotion.
View Fulltext   Html FullText     View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close